Skip to content
Skardu Times

View from the Top

Senate rejects bill to curb diplomatic passports for advisers

The private member's move by PTI Senator Faisal Saleem Rehman and two colleagues sought to end diplomatic passports for ministers of state, advisers and senior officials.

Skardu Times desk1 min read
Senate rejects bill to curb diplomatic passports for advisers

The Senate on Monday rejected a motion to introduce the Passports (Amendment) Bill, 2026, blocking a private member's attempt to withdraw diplomatic passport privileges from ministers of state, advisers, special assistants and senior bureaucrats.

The bill was moved by PTI Senator Faisal Saleem Rehman, who chairs the Senate Standing Committee on Interior, together with senators Samina Mumtaz Zehri and Saifullah Abro. Dawn reported that the proposed legislation was aimed at ending what the report described as the free-for-all issuance of diplomatic passports to these categories of office-holders.

State Minister for Interior Tallal Chaudhry spoke against the bill in the house. Dawn quoted him as saying: "You are bringing an amendment to the authority…" The report published only that portion of his remarks.

Because the motion for introduction was rejected, the bill does not advance to the committee stage, and the rules governing who may hold a diplomatic passport stay as they are. The Senate's decision leaves the existing practice untouched for ministers of state, advisers, special assistants and senior bureaucrats.

The mover, Senator Rehman, heads the upper house's standing committee on interior, the body that takes up the ministry's legislative and administrative business in the Senate. The other two movers, senators Zehri and Abro, signed on to the same private member's bill.

The rejection was also carried by Ua.News, which reported the outcome and credited Dawn for the account.

Private member's bills are introduced by senators or MNAs in their individual capacity rather than on the government's behalf, and a motion for introduction must clear the house before the proposed law can be taken up clause by clause. Once a motion is rejected, the bill lapses at that stage.

No vote count was given in the reports, and no statement from the Senate secretariat or the interior ministry on the outcome was available. It was not immediately clear from the published accounts whether the movers intend to bring the amendment back in another form.